Saturday, January 10, 2009

Army's 'John Doe' Letter: A Brigadier General Apologizes on YouTube

Following up on that Army 'John Doe' Letter SNAFU that affected about 7,000 families:

Army's Adjutant General Apologizes on YouTube

Brigadier General Reuben Jones, the Army's Adjutant General, is on YouTube. For about three and a half minutes, he:
  • Apologizes
  • Tells what happened
  • Tells what the Army is doing for its 'family'
    1. Recommunicating with those families "in a proper way"
    2. Communicating with Army leaders around the world: so they know the facts, and can answer questions when family members come, with questions
    3. "Doing everything humanly possible to prevent this from ever happening again"
  • Briefly describes Survivor Outreach Services, or SOS, a program that helps the families of fallen soldiers
The URL displayed for SOS in the video didn't work for me. You might try "Army Survivor Outreach Services" on the military.com website for an overview, or Google "survivor outreach services" to find something more local.

The video went up yesterday. 304 people had viewed the video when I saw it this evening. I wrote, "I think the Army has been handling the aftermath rather well" back on Wednesday. I still think so.

"Army issues apology for letter error"

soldiermediacenter, YouTube (January 9, 2009)
video (3:32)

Related Post: There's more, at soldiersmediacenter on YouTube.

2 comments:

george said...

I recently came accross your blog and have been reading along. I thought I would leave my first

comment. I dont know what to say except that I have enjoyed reading. Nice blog. I will keep

visiting this blog very often.


Alessandra

http://www.craigslistpostingonline.info

Brian, aka Nanoc, aka Norski said...

george / Alessandra,

Thanks for the good words.

Everyone else: FYI, that 'george' link is to www.craigslistpostingonline.info

Unique, innovative candles


Visit us online:
Spiral Light CandleFind a Retailer
Spiral Light Candle Store

Blogroll

Note! Although I believe that these websites and blogs are useful resources for understanding the War on Terror, I do not necessarily agree with their opinions. 1 1 Given a recent misunderstanding of the phrase "useful resources," a clarification: I do not limit my reading to resources which support my views, or even to those which appear to be accurate. Reading opinions contrary to what I believed has been very useful at times: sometimes verifying my previous assumptions, sometimes encouraging me to change them.

Even resources which, in my opinion, are simply inaccurate are sometimes useful: these can give valuable insights into why some people or groups believe what they do.

In short, It is my opinion that some of the resources in this blogroll are neither accurate, nor unbiased. I do, however, believe that they are useful in understanding the War on Terror, the many versions of Islam, terrorism, and related topics.