Tuesday, March 4, 2008

A Marine, A Puppy, and Serious Abuse: 'It Must be Real: I Saw it on YouTube!'

This must be a frustrating time for Berkeleyites and other anti-American atavisms.

Yearning for My Lai?

Back in the Golden Age of the sixties, the "My Lai massacre" was so well-known, and so many Americans had been properly conditioned, that "My Lai" generated an intense, visceral response almost everywhere. And maybe a sit-in, or even a protest march. Those were the days!

Abu Ghraib: a Forlorn Hope

Four years ago, Abu Ghraib showed real promise. In the first months of 2004, people around the world were being disgusted by more and more photos of disgusting things that were being done in a prison in Iraq. I got the impression that the Al Jazeera version, that "US commander 'allowed prison abuse' " was the default attitude. To be fair, Aljazeera did write that there was a US army inquiry into the mess.

In fact, American military officials realized that something was wrong, and had been investigating Abu Ghraib since August 11, 2003.

What Went So Wrong?!

Possibly because news today isn't controlled by the tight little quartet of The New York Times, ABC, CBS, and NBC, with PBS riding point, Americans just don't seem to be as well managed these days. Four years later, Abu Ghraib just doesn't have the traction of My Lai: and Abu Ghraib was a real scandal1.

Back to Reality: A Marine, a Puppy(?), and a Video

Recently, someone put a video on YouTube. It showed someone in what looks like a Marine lance corporal's uniform, throwing what looks like a puppy (the puppy doesn't move) over a cliff. There's even an off-camera yelp.

Shocking! Deplorable!

Well, yes: it is. At least, the Marines think so.

" 'The video is shocking and deplorable and is contrary to the high standards we expect of every Marine,' Major Chris Perrine, the public affairs director at the Marine Corps base in Kaneohe Bay, Hawaii, said in a statement.

" 'This video came to our attention this morning, and we have initiated an investigation,' he said. 'We do not tolerate this type of behavior and will take appropriate action.' "

Posts I found in the blogosphere about this latest evidence of American atrocities was surprisingly low-key: In fact, at least one blogger brought up a reasonable question: The video isn't available any more: I checked at YouTube, and found that it's been pulled: "This video has been removed due to terms of use violation.."

That last blog ("Marine Tosses Puppy ....") observed that the video was of low quality to begin with, and that YouTube compression hadn't done it any favors. Also that the yelp didn't seem to exhibit a doppler effect (what happens with sound and motion that makes a passing truck sound like it's going "wheeee-oooo.")

I'd like to believe that the video is a fake, but it's possible that there is a Marine out there who threw a puppy down a cliff, and someone who videotaped the animal abuse. If that's so, I'm sincerely glad that I'm not that Marine.

This Isn't the Sixties

As for whether the puppy-pitching perpetrator will become a center of anti-American feelings in the tradition of My Lai, I doubt it. This isn't the sixties any more:
  • A few news editors on the coasts don't decide what Americans hear and read.
    A fragmented assortment of news outlets, and hordes of bloggers, ensure that facts get out, no matter who doesn't like them
  • American society isn't focused on an angst-filled generation, whose parents had followed 'expert' advice while chasing a dream of material success
  • Remember those
    • 'I Was a Teenage...' movies
    • Teen-on-the-street interviews, where reporters asked teens for opinions about socioeconomic aspects of contemporary political issues?
      • And took the answers seriously?
I hope that, if in fact a puppy was treated that way, whoever killed it is provided with consequences.
More, at "Marines: Puppy Abuse YouTube Video 'Deplorable,' Investigation Launched" FOXNews (March 4, 2008)

After Word: My Lai and Abu Ghraib, Perception and Reality

1The "My Lai massacre" doesn't seem to be quite the monstrous atrocity that Americans were led to believe. An alternative to the standard anti-American story:
  • The My Lai attack took place in a free fire zone (by definition occupied only by Viet Cong)
  • My Lai was be a supply depot for Viet Cong food and munitions
  • After questioning My Lai villagers turned out to be Viet Cong and/or VC sympathizers
  • My Lai villagers refused to expose spider/fighting holes, but U.S. soldiers found them anyway
  • The U.S. soldiers were battle weary, and believed that the villagers were the same enemy which had recently engaged them with sniper fire a booby traps: which wasn't too far from the truth
This fairly routine, if violent, act of war became an example of how heartless, cruel, and barbaric the American military was, back in the sixties. As I said before, it must be frustrating that "Abu Ghraib," representing a real set of atrocities, failed to become a rallying cry.

(I got my information from: "an informal Q & A resource" and "Vietnam War My Lai Massacre Department of Defense Documents." In both cases, the sources of information are units of the U.S. military - 'and you know what they're like.')


Brigid said...

I can't really say anything about My Lai since all I know about it is listed in this post.

But that video strikes me as a really sick joke.

I'm not even certain if that's a real dog. It looks real enough, but I don't think a really puppy being held like that with people around talking and even coming close to poking it would stay that still.

And I would think it'd be easy enough to get a uniform like that from an army surplus store.

Again. It's a really sick joke.

Kudos to the marine corps for jumping onto it so fast.

Brian H. Gill said...


As you said.

My impression is that the USMC takes the honor of the corps very seriously.

The brass seems to have gotten on top of this situation within 24 hours of its discovery: not bad response time, even in the Information Age.

Unique, innovative candles

Visit us online:
Spiral Light CandleFind a Retailer
Spiral Light Candle Store


Note! Although I believe that these websites and blogs are useful resources for understanding the War on Terror, I do not necessarily agree with their opinions. 1 1 Given a recent misunderstanding of the phrase "useful resources," a clarification: I do not limit my reading to resources which support my views, or even to those which appear to be accurate. Reading opinions contrary to what I believed has been very useful at times: sometimes verifying my previous assumptions, sometimes encouraging me to change them.

Even resources which, in my opinion, are simply inaccurate are sometimes useful: these can give valuable insights into why some people or groups believe what they do.

In short, It is my opinion that some of the resources in this blogroll are neither accurate, nor unbiased. I do, however, believe that they are useful in understanding the War on Terror, the many versions of Islam, terrorism, and related topics.