Al Qaeda, Al Arabiya, Dubai, and Common Sense

This is interesting, and hopeful:

"Popular Arab TV Program Exposes the Real Al Qaeda

"The show is called 'Death Making' in Arabic, hardly the way Al Qaeda probably wants itself described.

"But that is how the powerful pan-Arabic satellite channel Al Arabiya casts the terror organization and its foot soldiers in its popular television program.

"Hosted by female correspondent Rima Salha, the Dubai-based show is heading into its third year on Al Arabiya and aims to influence how the Arab world views Al Qaeda...."
("Popular Arab TV Program Exposes the Real Al Qaeda" FOXNews (September 1, 2009))

This seems like a bold move for an outfit in that part of the world: but Dubai has struck me as having leaders who understand the real world, even if they don't quite approve, and are making an effort at catching up on several centuries of changes.

The Al Arabiya show (third year?! not bad at all!) is one of those instances where 'those Muslims' defy the stereotype that organizations like Al Qaida and the Taliban have worked so hard to establish: that a Muslim is a religious fanatic . I hope this sort of thing catches on.

Once their petroleum reserves run out, and/or the rest of the world finds a viable alternative, many people in the Middle East will be in for a massive change in fortune. I think it'll be easier for countries there to adjust - or, better yet, prepare - if many of their citizens aren't struggling to live in the pre-Magna Carta world.

I'm no huge fan of Dubai. The country has a dubious record when it comes to freedom of expression and interference with online communications. On the other hand, Dubai's Sheik Rashid understands what a great opportunity his land has - and how little time there is to use it.

"...He knew that his land's oil was a source of great wealth that would last - a while. Looking at the few decades of prosperity that drilling for petroleum would yield, he said, 'My grandfather rode a camel, my father rode a camel, I drive a Mercedes, my son drives a Land Rover, his son will drive a Land Rover, but his son will ride a camel."...'
(December 8, 2007)

Dubai's world-class architecture is part of an economic development plan intended to keep the people going after the oil revenue runs out. Judging from this program, it looks like Dubai's good sense may extend beyond economics. Or, maybe someone there realizes that it'll be easier to make a profit without religious crazies blowing up people and buildings.

Either way, if Sheik Rashid's plans work, and Al Arabiya's programming helps change minds and hearts in the Middle East: it's good news for Dubai, and for the rest of us.

Somewhat-related posts:

• "Oh, Dear: Libyan Terrorist Traded for Oil?"
  (August 30, 2009)
• "Kilometer-High Tower on Hold"
  Apathetic Lemming of the North (January 14, 2009)
• "Dubai Architecture: A Photo Gallery"
  Apathetic Lemming of the North (October 25, 2008)
• "Another Dubai Skyscraper: This One Spins"
  Apathetic Lemming of the North (June 27, 2008)
• "World's Longest Arch Bridge Proposed - Bin Laden's Building it"
  (August 27, 2008)
• "Is the War on Terror a War on Islam? Not Quite"
  (December 8, 2007) Particularly
  • Investing in the Future
• "Different Strokes for Different Folks: How Middle Eastern Culture Deals With Reality?"
  (November 2, 2007)
• "Filtering, Censorship, and Dealing With It"
  Apathetic Lemming of the North (September 14, 2007)
• "The Internet: USA Rules, UAE Rules"
  Apathetic Lemming of the North (August 14, 2007)

Freedom of Speech: America and Dubai

Dubai seems to be a quite charming part of the world. I've posted about some of the remarkable architectural projects there in another blog.

But, all things considered, I'd rather deal with Minnesota winters, than Dubai's benevolent dictatorship.

I learned that FLCKR is banned there: and that at least part of GO! Smell the Flowers got banned. The GO! ban might have been in China, though, since the 'objectionable' material involved Tibet: or "Xizang," as China likes to call the 'province' they conquered in the fifties.

Related posts, on censorship, propaganda, and freedom of speech.

Is the War on Terror a War on Islam? Not Quite

Some people in western countries and some Islamists have common ground. They both think that the War on Terror is a war against Islam.

It's easy to see the war that way. Al Qaeda, the Taliban, and similar groups claim to be defending Islam. Attacking these groups can be seen as attacking Islam.

At this point, I'm assuming that these terrorist organizations are related to Islam in about the same way that the Westboro Baptist Church and the Ku Klux Klan are related to Christianity.

When all members of a religious group are also members of the same culture, it's easy to get confused over which values are part of the culture, and which are part of the religion. I think that's part of what's happening in parts of the Islamic world.

Events in Turkey may be an example of this confusion of religion and culture.

Last January an Armenian journalist, Hrant Dink, was killed in Turkey. He was one of those people who say that massive die-off of Armenians toward the start of the 20th century was genocide. That didn't make him popular among what other journalists call "hardline nationalists" in Turkey. In April, three Christians were killed in Turkey. They were involved with the printing of Bibles.

Both times, there were allegations that Turkish police were involved in the killings. In the second case, at least, Turkey's national government is investingating ("Turkey investigates alleged ties between police and alleged killers of Christians").

That news article from The Canadian Press concludes:

""Many Turks are convinced that a so-called "deep state" - a network of state agents or ex-officials, possibly with links to organized crime - periodically targets reformists and other perceived enemies in the name of nationalism.

"Christian leaders have said they are worried that nationalists are stoking hostility against non-Turks and non-Muslims by exploiting uncertainty over Turkey's place in the world.

"The uncertainty - and growing suspicion against foreigners - has been driven by Turkey's faltering EU membership bid, a resilient Kurdish separatist movement and by increasingly vocal Islamists who see themselves - and Turkey - as locked in battle with a hostile Christian West."
(The Canadian Press)

Fatal collisions of religion, culture, and politics have happened before.

Northern European leaders in the 16th century had a very good reason for embracing Martin Luther's ideas. Powers in southern Europe had a head start in developing trade with the rest of the world. They were the rich, powerful, and influential countries: and the northern newcomers wanted a bigger piece of the action.

A stumbling block in the northern princes' path was the Roman Catholic Church. Emphasis on Roman, here. A German monk bent on reform was too good an opportunity to ignore. It's no wonder that Europe's northern states eagerly embraced a religion that was Christian, without politically inconvenient ties to an Italian city-state.

That's an oversimplification, of course. Great sea-changes in a subcontinent's culture and religion can't be detailed in 103 words. But I think that political expedience and economic motives go a long way toward explaining why Germany and the Scandinavian states jumped on the Lutheran bandwagon, and Henry VIII of England set up an independent church in his kingdom.

Half a millenium later, I see a very similar scenario playing out. Some people in Saudi Arabia and other Middle Eastern states are very rich. Some nations, like Kuwait, even have a generally high standard of living. However, many individuals in the Middle East are far from wealthy, and an end of the oil boom is on the horizon.

Investing in the Future

Some leaders in the Middle East are investing today's oil revenue in education and economic projects. An example is the United Arab Emirates' Dubai (or Dubayy). When oil was discovered in Dubai, in the sixties, the U.A.E. leader Sheik Rashid bin Saeed Al Maktoum built an up-to-date sea port and airport in Dubai.

Sheik Rashid was no fool. He knew that his land's oil was a source of great wealth that would last - a while. Looking at the few decades of prosperity that drilling for petroleum would yield, he said:

"My grandfather rode a camel, my father rode a camel, I drive a Mercedes, my son drives a Land Rover, his son will drive a Land Rover, but his son will ride a camel."
("Sheikh Rashid bin Saeed Al Maktoum," Emiratweet)

The economic projects of Sheik Rashid and his sons, Sheik Maktoum bin Rashid Al Maktoum, who died in January of 2006, and Sheik Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum, are still putting the United Arab Emirates on the map: Particularly the tourism industry in Dubai.

An Alternative Response to the 21st Century

Other people in the Middle East see the outside world as a threat. Since their version of Islam seems to be a puree of Mohammed's teachings, ancient cultural traditions like honor killings, and ideas cooked up by their imams, a powerful civilization which values individual freedom and tolerance really is a threat to what they believe, and their way of life.

I think that "Islamists" who hate and fear the west, and believe that the War on Terror is a war of Christianity on Islam are telling the truth: as they see it.

I also think that allowing these religious fanatics and their politically-motivated friends to continue controlling territory and speaking for "Islam" will be a disaster for the world's free nations, and for Islam.

---

About Dubai: I admire what Dubai and the U.A.E. is doing, in general. That doesn't mean that I approve of everything that goes on there ("UAE, Censorship, Shari'a Law, Freedom: So What?" (August 14, 2007)). Even so, I'm impressed with leaders who have the vision to use a fleeting source of wealth for projects that may enrich their people for many generations.

Related posts, on Islam, Christianity, Religion, Culture and the War on Terror.

Ay-rabs at NASDAQ! So What?

Big news: Dubai is buying a piece of NASDAQ.

It's more complicated than that, of course. There's a swap involving OMX, a Nordic group, Borse Dubai, and DIFX, Dubai’s international exchange. If you want to sort it all out, good luck. There's an article at Financial Times, www.ft.com.

Predictably, there's a fuss over terrorists hacking into NASDAQ through Dubai, foreign ownership, and all the rest.

I agree with part of the concern. I hope that NASDAQ has security measures in place, guarding against any of their members hacking into their system.

As to the rest, I may be missing something, but I don't see a problem with a wealthy Middle Eastern power having an interest in keeping NASDAQ up and running and profitable.

There's nothing like enlightened self-interest, for keeping the peace.

Related posts, on tolerance, bigotry, racism, and hatred