Showing posts with label holidays. Show all posts
Showing posts with label holidays. Show all posts

Sunday, November 11, 2012

An American President, Armistice Day, and a Comic Strip Character

The 11th day of November is Armistice Day. Over the decades it's been called National, Poppy, and Rembrance Day. These days, Americans call it Veteran's Day.

Some of the most sensible words I've seen recorded that apply to this holiday come from a comic strip character, and an American president:
"Y'know, it seems to be me this is all backwards....We, Ever'body, ought to keep our big mouths shut all the whole year long so's we'd have time to think of two minutes worth of somethin. to say on the eleventh day of November."
(Porky Pine, in Pogo; Walt Kelly (1953))

"Human nature will not change. In any future great national trial, compared to the men of this, we shall have as weak and as strong, as silly and as wise, as bad and as good."
(Abraham Lincoln, Response to a serenade (November 10, 1864))

Adapted from:
Related posts:

Wednesday, July 4, 2012

Independence Day, 2012



Related posts:

Friday, November 11, 2011

Freedom, Even For 'Those People Over There'

I've posted about Veterans Day; AKA Armistice, National, Poppy, and Rembrance Day; before. Links to some of those posts are under "Veterans Day posts," below.

This post isn't about Veterans Day, or the folks who served in the military. It's more about why there's been a fairly steady stream of folks willing to sacrifice for this country's welfare.

That other post is about two related threats to freedom of speech: which I think warrants doing links and excerpts here.

"My Take on the News: 'There Oughtta be a Law?' "
A Catholic Citizen in America (November 11, 2011)

"The threat of Islamic laws forbidding blasphemy, and hostility toward religion, have been in the news. I think both are really bad ideas...."

"...I've noticed that many folks act as if it's their duty, or right, to force others to act 'correctly.' I remember the trailing edge of McCarthyism, endured American academia when political correctness was in flower, and didn't particularly like what either philosophical fad did to personal freedoms...."
As the blog's name, "A Catholic Citizen in America," suggests, I'm a practicing Catholic. One reason I like living in America is that folks here are free to worship as they see fit, or not worship at all. That's a big plus for someone who's part of a religious minority.

Back to that other blog's post:

" 'Everybody Knows What Those People are Like' "

"On the whole, I'm glad that I've never been part of a self-identified group of self-righteous do-gooders who had the power to make others act the 'right' way. Not being part of 'the establishment' can be an advantage.1"

"If that doesn't sound like what 'one of those religious people' should say: I'm not surprised. I'll get back to that...."
(A Catholic Citizen in America)
After that bit, I discuss bias, and offer a Bias Made Easy checkoff list of qualities often ascribed to 'those people over there.'

Freedom of Religion, Not Freedom from Religion

Editorial views of The New York Times notwithstanding, people with religious beliefs are not necessarily ignorant weirdos.1 Which brings me back to religious freedom and that other blog:
"...I'm a practicing Catholic, so I have to support freedom of religion. It's in the rules (Catechism of the Catholic Church, 2104-2109)"

"Freedom: For Everyone

"That freedom is not 'freedom to worship my way.' Even if I could, I wouldn't be allowed force someone to 'act Catholic'..."

"...Today's threat to freedom isn't just 'those terrorists over there.' I think Americans should be at least as concerned about folks in today's establishment who seem determined to protect us from religion.

"'For our own good,' of course...."
(A Catholic Citizen in America)
I am grateful to the generations of American veterans who fought and died so that we could remain a free nation. I sincerely hope that America's upper crust don't accomplish what enemies abroad have failed to do: end this country's long tradition of freedom.

Veterans Day posts:

1 The New York Times ran an editorial recently, that compared people who admit having religious beliefs to those who believe in flying saucers. I am not making this up:I can't know why the NYT editor made the assumptions he did, but I suspect that he may be like the expert who only reads his own books. Old-school American journalism's upper echelons are, I think, an increasingly isolated and insular little subculture. Which may explain why they they act the way they do:Finally, despite what Americans often see in the news, these colorful folks aren't typical Christians. In my view, they're not even representative of American Protestants:


(Reuters photo, via FoxNews.com, used w/o permission)


(Oakland Blog, via SFGate, used w/o permission)

I've made the point, in another blog, that not all Christians are dolts:

Saturday, May 28, 2011

Memorial Day Weekend 2011

This year's Naval Academy graduation ceremony didn't have a Blue Angels flyover this year. The aerobatics squadron's commander quit recently.

That, I think, is an example of the high level of professionalism in the United States military.

Commander Dave Koss had been leading the team since November - but after flying below altitude at a recent appearance, he decided to step down from his position.

That failure to stay within limits set for the mission shouldn't have happened, obviously. What impressed me was Commander Koss accepting responsibility, and letting someone else take over.

Memorial Day Weekend, 2011

It's Memorial Day weekend. For many Americans this is the unofficial start of summer: a three-day holiday that gives folks a chance to get out to the lakes, grill burgers, or just sit on the stoop and relax.

I've grilled burgers, and plan to relax on the stoop later this afternoon. It's a beautiful, warm, sunny day here in central Minnesota.

Before I do that, though, I've got two words for everyone who serves and has served in the American armed forces. Particularly those who never came home:

Thank you.



Related posts:In the news:

Sunday, July 4, 2010

Fourth of July, 2010

Today is the Fourth of July: America's Independence Day. On the whole, I'd rather live here in America than anywhere else.

As someone, it may have been Paul Harvey, pointed out, America is one of the few countries people are trying to break into.

Related posts:

Saturday, July 4, 2009

Statue of Liberty's Crown: Happy Birthday, America

The Statue of Liberty, in New York City's harbor, would be an impressive piece of weathered copper by itself. Lady Liberty, including the torch, stands an inch short of 152 feet tall. It's 305 feet, six inches, from the pedestal's foundation to the top of the torch.

It's been standing in New York Harbor since the 1880s.

And, since the September 11, 2001, attack, the crown has been closed to visitors. That wasn't the first time that an act of terrorism affected access to the Statue of Liberty. A saboteur set off a bomb in 1916, and the torch has been off limits to the public ever since.

Today, almost 10 years after 9/11, visitors are in the crown again.
"...'On July 4th, we are giving America a special gift,' [Secretary of the Interior Ken] Salazar said. 'We are once again inviting the public to celebrate our great nation and the hope and opportunity it symbolizes by climbing to Lady Liberty’s crown for a unique view of New York Harbor, where the forbearers of millions of American families first saw the new world.'..." (National Park Service)
The Statue of Liberty is special in large part because it's near Ellis Island, and was often the first sight immigrants had of their new country. And yes, I know: Ellis Island didn't provide an ideal welcome to America's citizens-to-be.

I'll freely admit that America isn't perfect. But I've lived here all my life, and don't plan to move. That's a reasoned conclusion, not a fond sentiment. I took a serious look at my options, a few decades back, and came to the conclusion that, occasionally maddening as it was, there wasn't a better place on Earth - for me, at any rate.

It's been that way for over two centuries now. America has been a country run by human beings: with all the blunders and occasional ill will that goes with it. But it's also a place that, over the centuries, has been better than many alternatives.

My family history doesn't record motives for everyone, but it's a safe assumption that many of my ancestors came to America because they thought they could do better here than in the old country. Some came because they'd be free to practice their religion here. And one member of the family came because she'd joined a friend on an ocean cruise, got violently seasick, and couldn't stand the thought of another ocean voyage.

I think it's significant that America is a country people are trying to get into, not out of. (June 20, 2009)

And, I'm glad to see new faces in America - and Minnesota, where I live. On a trivial level, it means having a wider variety of food available in the grocery: there's a modest tract of shelving devoted to Mexican cookery, a few blocks south of my home. More importantly, America is getting people with a fresh look at the world, and a determination to achieve goals that's strong enough to bring them from their homelands to a foreign country.

Sure, many of them are 'just' working in poultry plants. (December 4, 2008) Most of my ancestors were laborers and farmers for the first generation or so: it's not at all uncommon for people to get jobs that don't require refined language skills, until their English gets up to speed.

Not all immigrants have the agricultural equivalent of hamburger-flipper jobs, of course. For example, some own and operate small businesses. (July 3, 2009) Whatever the newest Americans bring with them, I think we'll all benefit as American culture gets aerated by new ideas.

More-or-less related posts: In the news: Background:

Monday, May 25, 2009

U.S. Army Chief of Staff Memorial Day Message - Video

General Casey is primarily concerned with the United States Army, naturally enough.

"Gen. Casey's Memorial Day Message"


From Army Media Player (May 14, 2009)
video 0:55

"Army Newswatch 09-11: Chief of Staff Gen. Casey takes a few moments to offer words of support and encouragement for Soldiers, Civilians, contractors and their families around the world as we look toward Memorial Day."

I'll take the general's words, and extend them to everyone connected with the American armed forces:

"...So, on this memorial Day, I'd really like to thank them for their sacrifices, and because it's their sacrifices that make this country what it is today: the greatest country on Earth."

The same video is on YouTube:

"Gen. Casey's Memorial Day Message"
soldiersmediacenter, YouTube (May 19, 2009)
video 0:55

Thursday, July 3, 2008

United States of America: 232 Years in the Freedom Business

(updated July 4, 2008)

I'm relieved that American courts are finally sorting out the mess created when the federal government broke all those treaties with Indian nations in the nineteenth century.

On the other hand, I cannot approve of the way that America acquired Hawaii.

And there is, in my opinion, no excuse for how the Confederate States of America were treated by the Reconstruction's carpetbaggers, following the War Between the States.

America Isn't Perfect

The country that was launched 232 years ago today, with the signing of the Declaration of Independence, is on it's second constitution. The first one, the Articles of Confederation, didn't work. The second constitution is doing a bit better. It's now the oldest written constitution that's still being used.

Even so, the Constitution isn't perfect. Over the centuries, the Constitution has been amended twenty seven times. One amendment, the eighteenth, was repealed by another, the twenty first. The latest one, ratified in 1992, limits congressional pay raises.

I'm pretty sure that, given time, there will be more amendments.

As I said, the Constitution isn't perfect.

Neither is the country whose government the Constitution defines.

Even so, I am proud to be an American.

I know: that sounds corny. Or worse.

A fellow in an online community had the poor judgment to say "be proud, America!" when the Phoenix lander successfully touched down on Mars. He was roundly chastised for singling out the American contribution to this international effort. One of the opening salvos was "Hmmm, 'be proud America', perhaps you should do some more reading and you'll discover this mission is actually a joint venture that includes Canada, Denmark, Switzerland, Germany and Finland."

From a 'sophisticated' point of view, there must be something wrong with me. I'm proud to be an American. I don't avoid mentioning American accomplishments. I don't wring my hands over how awful this country is. I don't complain about how terrible it is that people come here to enjoy its freedom and opportunity.

Which gets me back to the title of this post.

For almost two and a third centuries, America has been in the freedom business.

Yes. I know. America isn't perfect. Our freedom isn't perfect. Never has been. I know that slavery was one aspect of the War Between the States. It's quite true that indentured servants were not always well treated. For that matter, neither were my Irish ancestors.

But America is still a free country. An American citizen can, with remarkably few limits, harangue against officials: elected or otherwise. He or she can publish papers bitterly railing against the American military.

Or, as American citizens, we can make better use of our time (in my opinion), and look for a better job, move to another town or city, or set up our own business. If we're smart, a little 'lucky,' and persistent, the odds are that eventually we'll hit a winning combination.



Success isn't guaranteed, of course, but it's possible. And, allowed.

Freedom has even become an American export. Around the world, since 1776, kings and emperors have, to a great extent, been replaced by presidents. Again, none of these newer democracies are perfect. Some are very far from perfect.

The point is, there is an effort, in many parts of the world, to let the people of a country have a greater say in what that country's government does - and in what they're allowed to do.

Although there were philosophical movements at work in the eighteenth century that helped start this trend, I like to think that the United States of America helped.

For one thing, this country has been proof that a free country can exist, and thrive.

(USAF Photo by TSgt Andy Dunaway, from "On Point II," page 421, used w/o permission)
"Figure 105. Iraqi men proudly show their inked-stained fingers after voting in Hayji, Iraq."

Sometimes, America has been more than simply a good example. For good or ill, The United States of America has, from time to time, gotten very directly involved in the affairs of other countries.

Generally, such American actions have had a devastating effect on dictators and tyrants. Whether or not America has any business freeing people in other countries from the likes of Adolph Hitler, the Taliban, and Saddam Hussein is still hotly debated.

My opinion is that, for all its faults, American is still a land of opportunity: and that freedom is something that the citizenry of all nations should have.


More, at
Update (July 4, 2008)
Freedom of Speech in America: a case in point.
"Protesters Interrupt Bush at Independence Day Ceremony for New Citizens"
FOXNews (July 4, 2008)

"Protesters made it hard to hear President Bush Friday as he welcomed new citizens and marked Independence Day at the home of Thomas Jefferson.

"As is the tradition each Fourth of July, a naturalization ceremony was held at Monticello in Charlottesville, Va. This year, 76 immigrants from 30 different countries came to take the oath of citizenship....

" 'That man is a fascist!' one protester yelled. Another swore at him.

"The protesters later were removed from the ceremony by law enforcement officials.1

" 'To my fellow citizens to be — we believe in free speech in the United States of America,' Bush said when the protesters started shouting.

"To the din of more yelling, Bush discussed Jefferson’s legacy as he introduced the citizens.

" 'We honor Jefferson’s legacy by aiding the rise of liberty in lands that do not know the blessings of freedom, and on this Fourth of July we pay tribute to the brave men and women who wear the uniform of the United States of America,' he said...."

Another news service did a more thorough job of detailing the protester's grievances:

"Bush was heckled several times, with some people yelling 'War criminal!' One man shouted, 'This man has brought fascism to our shores!' About nine people were removed from the ceremony.

" 'Impeach Bush. Impeach Bush. Amend the Constitution,' shouted another protester, prompting both cheers and boos from the audience of about 3,000 people...."
("Bush helps swear in citizens as hecklers shout" CNN (July 4, 2008))
[emphases mine]

I've wondered how many people who yell 'fascist!' at American leaders they don't like know about real fascist leaders.2 Think about it: what would probably have happened to someone who shouted "That man is a Jew!" or "This man has brought Judaism to our shores!" at Chancellor Hitler, at a public gathering?

1That phrase, "removed...by law enforcement officials", doesn't carry the implication of dire consequences that it does in some countries. Those protesters may face legal sanctions for disturbing the peace, and - if they wanted a little more martyrdom, and fussed as they were removed - resisting arrest.

2 The page I linked to, in Best of History Websites, lists a number of pretty good online resources about Hitler, Mussolini, and the mid-twentieth century fascists. It used to have a video showing Adolph Hitler making a speech. The video is gone, replaced with the words, "We're sorry, this video is no longer available."

I understand that someone who had endured the Nazi regime in Germany might not like to watch the Fuhrer, and listen to his words. But I am truly sorry to see that what I trust is a well-meaning censorship has removed evidence that might help people learn what went so horribly wrong.

I was born after the survivors of Dachau and other camps were liberated. But, I've seen and heard speeches of Chancellor Hitler. Remembering the experience is not pleasant, but it taught me to be very cautious about emotion-laden appeals.

Particularly from people who seem to support causes that I like.

Thursday, February 14, 2008

Valentine's Day Forbidden: Somehow, I'm Not Surprised

"Valentine's Day forbidden by Islam, but Gaza's Hamas rulers largely look the other way" "Minneapolis Star Tribune" (February 14, 2007)

Here's how it goes in Gaza:
  • Valentine's Day is officially "haram," or forbidden by Islam (Hamas-style)
  • Most of the people in Gaza don't have the spare change for frills, anyway
  • The "Eid el Hob" (Feast of Love) gets celebrated anyway - upscale neighborhood shops feature buckets of flowers, heart-shaped decorations, and colored carnations
  • Hamas police look the other way
They're following orders. The Islamic rulers of Gaza seem to have a policy of being Islamic on paper and reasonable on the street.

Reactions to Valentine's Day in the Middle East, according to the "Star Tribune" / Associated Press article, are a pretty good indicator of just how "fundamentalist" the local flavor or Islam is.

Places run by people who tolerate those who don't do everything their way tend to tolerate Valentine's Day. Those with what might be euphemistically called an old-fashioned view of Islam don't.

In a way, I can see the latter's point. Valentine's Day certainly doesn't come from the Arab world: and people for whom anything 'not invented here' is unthinkable couldn't be expected to like a mushy celebration like Valentine's Day.

So: hats off to Hamas, for having the sense to let its subjects do something they enjoy. Even if the Prophet, or their top imam, didn't order them to.

Related posts, on tolerance, bigotry, racism, and hatred.

Saturday, October 13, 2007

Empire State Building Shines Green for Eid

Happy Eid, I think is a correct expression.

It's Eid-al-Fitr, or Eid ul-Fitr, or Id-Ul-Fitr or عيد الفطر, or Eid: the end of Ramadan.

And the Empire State Building is lit up in green, to commemorate the time. It was green back on the the 9th, too, in honor of the New York Restoration Project and NYC Parks Department - Million Trees NYC.

Not that the Empire State Building lights up for just anything. Those lights are reserved for special occasions, like Christmas, Hanukkah, and New York winning the World Series.

All of which doesn't have much to do with the war on terror.

Except that I think it's enlightening to compare America, particularly the Big Apple, to a very Muslim country like Saudi Arabia. America and the West is supposed to be oppressing Muslims? Unless lighting up the Empire State Building is imperialistic?

I hope that the Empire State Building shines greenly for St. Patrick's Day. Otherwise, there could be a lot of irate Irishmen!

Saturday, July 7, 2007

Freedom, Foolishness, and the Fourth

On Independence Day (U.S. - July 4), in another blog, I posted the last sentence of the Declaration of Independence of the United States of America, and the names of the people who signed it.

The flame that followed didn't last much more than 24 hours, but it was impressive.

Not much later, in a blog started by someone else, on Freedom, one of the advocates of absolute freedom proposed the following argument. (Aside from bleeping some of the more adult, sophisticated, and mature statements, it is unabridged, copied directly from the original blog comment.)
"The state does not have the right to regulate 'shouting "Fire!" in a theater'.

"This is the oldest and most widely used sophistry of those who would abridge freedom speech as dfined in the First Amendment.

"Would you like to hear the full argument?

"Sorry, I no longer have the time or the interest in playing that game.

"The authoritarians who would abridge the full and clear meaning of the Bill of Rights are invited to play with themselves.

"It will all come out in the wash.

"S**** you and your 'God' too.

"Oh yeah, and lest I forget, and shut the f*** up and turn in your guns."
(source not available)
I'm sharing this as an example of the sort of freedom of expression that we enjoy in this country. In addition to the fellow who writes in slogans and epithets, there were a variety of well-thought-out arguments, some of which were not in agreement with current federal policy.

That sort of discussion isn't possible everywhere in the world, at least not with any degree of safety. There's a joke from the Cold War that can be dusted off and re-written to illustrate the point:

An American and an Iranian were discussing freedom of speech in their countries. The American said, "we are free to speak our mind here. I could stand in the middle of the Mall of America, and shout 'I think the American president is an idiot!' The Iranian replied, "we are just as free to speak our minds. I, too, could stand in the middle of the Tehran flower market and shout 'I think the American president is an idiot!'"

The War on Terror might also be called the War for Freedom. People like Osama bin Laden, Ayman al-Zawahri and Sheikh Hamed al-Ali; and groups like Al Qaeda, Fatah al-Islam and Hezbollah, all have one thing in common.

They, like Iranian president Ahmadinejad, believe that Islam should rule the world. Their brand of Islam, of course. Judging from what the Taliban did to Afghanistan, I would rather not see that happen.

Ahmadinejad makes his beliefs very clear, saying, "every problem we [Iranians] have will be solved by global Islamic rule" and "we must prepare ourselves to rule the world." These claims are both chilling, and remarkably difficult to find in traditional news sources.

I'd better make it clear that I hope, sincerely, that the 'rule the world' branch of Islam has the same relationship to Islam as a whole that the KKK did to Christianity, back in the sixties. Our problem is that today's Jihadists have power that the KKK could only have dreamed of.

Back to freedom.

Independence Day is a day for people in the States to get outside, grill at least one meal, set off or watch fireworks, and enjoy a day or two off. It's also a day to celebrate the signing the Declaration of Independence, when representatives from thirteen colonies laid out exactly why they would no longer be tied to England.

In this country, we celebrate Constitution Day on September 17. That holiday doesn't draw anywhere near as much attention, although it is the Constitution and its amendments, as interpreted by the Supreme Court, that determine how, and to what extent, we enjoy our freedom.

Back to the War on Terror.

It is important to remember that the War on Terror is an effort to keep crazed religious fanatics from committing mass murder. It's also an effort to keep them from setting up a theocracy that would make liberals' fears of the Bush administration seem like a welcome relief.

The other side of this coin is that the struggle against the Islamic jihad is a struggle for freedom. People in this country have gotten used to being able to speak their minds, to play soccer if they feel like it, and wear a wide variety of clothing.

It would be a shame if we lost that.

By the way: although about nine weeks, by my reckoning, separate Independence Day and Constitution Day (aka Citizenship Day), it took over 11 years (1776-1787) for the government of the United States to have its basic structure hammered out. And we're still arguing about how it should work.

Now, about half-way through the weekend after Independence Day, I think it would be appropriate to remember how the Declaration of Independence ends, and the people who took enormous risks so that those who followed them could disagree with the powers that be, and live to complain about how they were treated:

"And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.

[signed]

Georgia: Button Gwinnett; Lyman Hall; George Walton

North Carolina: William Hooper; Joseph Hewes; John Penn

South Carolina: Edward Rutledge; Thomas Heyward, Jr.; Thomas Lynch, Jr.; Arthur Middleton

Massachusetts: John Hancock

Maryland: Samuel Chase; William Paca; Thomas Stone; Charles Carroll of Carrollton

Virginia: George Wythe; Richard Henry Lee; Thomas Jefferson; Benjamin Harrison; Thomas Nelson, Jr.; Francis Lightfoot Lee; Carter Braxton

Pennsylvania: Robert Morris; Benjamin Rush; Benjamin Franklin; John Morton; George Clymer; James Smith; George Taylor; James Wilson; George Ross

Delaware: Caesar Rodney; George Read; Thomas McKean

New York: William Floyd; Philip Livingston; Francis Lewis; Lewis Morris

New Jersey: Richard Stockton; John Witherspoon; Francis Hopkinson; John Hart; Abraham Clark

Transcripts of the Declaration of Independence of the United States of America, the Consttitution of the United States of America, Amendments 1 through 10 (the Bill of Rights), and
Amendments 11-27 are available online.

On a more contemporary note, Jonathan D. Halevi's Al-Qaida's Intellectual Legacy: New Radical Islamic Thinking Justifying the Genocide of Infidels is interesting, if dry, reading. He's biased, though, since he's an infidel.

Unique, innovative candles


Visit us online:
Spiral Light CandleFind a Retailer
Spiral Light Candle Store

Blogroll

Note! Although I believe that these websites and blogs are useful resources for understanding the War on Terror, I do not necessarily agree with their opinions. 1 1 Given a recent misunderstanding of the phrase "useful resources," a clarification: I do not limit my reading to resources which support my views, or even to those which appear to be accurate. Reading opinions contrary to what I believed has been very useful at times: sometimes verifying my previous assumptions, sometimes encouraging me to change them.

Even resources which, in my opinion, are simply inaccurate are sometimes useful: these can give valuable insights into why some people or groups believe what they do.

In short, It is my opinion that some of the resources in this blogroll are neither accurate, nor unbiased. I do, however, believe that they are useful in understanding the War on Terror, the many versions of Islam, terrorism, and related topics.