Now, the United Nations Security Council is going to talk about it, and national leaders will say what they think about it. President Obama already has. He doesn't approve.
I can't say I'm too happy about the situation myself.
The Associated Press ran an op-ed that may have hit the nail on the head: North Korea wants something. That's why they did that test-firing.
It's too early to tell what Dear Leader wants. It could be money, one-on-one talks between North Korea and America, lifting of U.N. sanctions, a crate of lobsters: I'd say that almost anything's possible.
That one-on-one meeting with the American government is a big deal for North Korea's leadership. America has been meeting (or trying to) with North Korea, as part of a six-nation arrangement. That doesn't give North Korea the status it would get if North Korean diplomats had a private meeting with American diplomats.
Related posts:
- "North Korea - Again - Still - North Korea"
(March 26, 2009) - "North Korea Set to Launch - Communications Satellite?"
(February 27, 2009) - "North Korea Un-disables Reactor"
(September 27, 2008) - "North Korea Disables Reactor: Progress, of a Sort"
(June 27, 2008) - "Syria's Reactor and North Korea - Again"
(May 5, 2008)- Includes list of posts related to Syria's reactor, Israel's air raid on the reactor, more
- "Obama: N. Korea launch threatens nations near, far"
The Associated Press (April 5, 2009) - "Analysis: N. Korea rocket gambit bid for attention"
The Associated Press (April 5, 2009) - "U.N. Security Council to meet on N. Korea launch"
CNN (April 5, 2009) - "Q+A: What's in store for North Korea at the U.N.?"
Reuters (April 5, 2009)
No comments:
Post a Comment