Monday, April 27, 2009

Air Force One Attacks New York City: City Passes Air Raid Drill

Updated (April 28, 2009):
Raw video footage
The White House apologized, New York City's mayor was "furious" (so is president Obama) (CNN), and Manhattanites got quite a break from routine today.


(from CNN, used w/o permission)

People working in New York City's skyscrapers saw a large airliner flying low - obviously not in normal flight corridors - and being escorted, or maybe chased, by F-16 fighters. Many New Yorkers, remembering what happened on September 11, 2001, and wanting to see April 28, 2009, started heading for ground level.

The flight of the VC-25, a military version of the Boeing 747 that's called Air Force One when the President's on board, was cleared through the FAA: No problems there. And the New York City police knew about the flight.

According to New York's finest, they were supposed to keep mum about the flight. Makes sense, considering how sensitive the exact location of that particular aircraft is, whether the president's on it or not.

The police say they didn't tell anyone about the flight, because they were told not to: "...'The flight of a VC-25 aircraft and F-16 fighters this morning was authorized by the FAA for the vicinity of the Statue of Liberty with directives to local authorities not to disclose information about it but to direct any inquiries to the FAA Air Traffic Security Coordinator,' the statement said...." (FOX News)

This Was a Pretty Good Air Raid Drill

Putting a positive light on this, I think this morning's little incident can be seen as a test of New York City's readiness for the next attack.

The impromptu mock attack demonstrated that New Yorkers know how to react to an attack: even if authorities don't tell them what to do.

The VC-25 / F-16 flight's mission was to update stock photos.

Vaguely related posts: In the news:
Update (April 28, 2009)

"Raw: Low Flying Military Planes Cause Panic Near Statue of Liberty"

LETHLSS, YouTube (April 27, 2009)
video 1:56

Thanks to bnsullivan, on Twitter, for the URL.

4 comments:

Kraxpelax said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Brian, aka Nanoc, aka Norski said...

Kraxpelax,

Sorry, I appreciate the offer, but even an offer of reciprocal spam won't help. I have a no-spam policy for comments, and I Ching studies simply does not relate to this post.

Shane at Environmental Health-Wellness-Beauty,LLC said...

This was unbelievable!

Brian, aka Nanoc, aka Norski said...

Shane at Environmental Health-Wellness-Beauty,LLC,

I'm inclined to agree. Monumentally daft, certainly.

To arrange for an outsized airliner to be chased by military jets - near south Manhattan - only a few years after about 3,000 people were killed in an attack involving airliners - without telling New Yorkers - implies a profound lack of understanding of some sort.

I've no evidence: but I'm inclined to believe the New York police department's contention that they were told to keep quiet about this little demonstration. I've run into no indications that New York's Finest are stupid, or collectively sadistic enough, to pull a stunt like this.

Unique, innovative candles


Visit us online:
Spiral Light CandleFind a Retailer
Spiral Light Candle Store

Blogroll

Note! Although I believe that these websites and blogs are useful resources for understanding the War on Terror, I do not necessarily agree with their opinions. 1 1 Given a recent misunderstanding of the phrase "useful resources," a clarification: I do not limit my reading to resources which support my views, or even to those which appear to be accurate. Reading opinions contrary to what I believed has been very useful at times: sometimes verifying my previous assumptions, sometimes encouraging me to change them.

Even resources which, in my opinion, are simply inaccurate are sometimes useful: these can give valuable insights into why some people or groups believe what they do.

In short, It is my opinion that some of the resources in this blogroll are neither accurate, nor unbiased. I do, however, believe that they are useful in understanding the War on Terror, the many versions of Islam, terrorism, and related topics.