Saturday, February 28, 2009

If You Liked Hanoi Jane, You'll Love AMPAS in Iran: Maybe

Actually, the idea of some high-level creative types from America going to Iran "on a non-government mission, for a weekend of cultural and creative exchange meetings..." isn't all that daft.

AMPAS in Iran: Cultural Exchange, "Hanoi Jane II," or Something Else

On the other hand, I couldn't help remembering when the "Barbarella" starlet took her well-rounded talents to Hanoi: to "expose the lies and help end the war" - a very 'relevant' position, at the time.

My recollection is that her visit was hailed in the 'better' circles as a cry for peace - and proof that McCarthy-era blacklists hadn't entirely destroyed the heart of Hollywood.

Others started calling her 'Hanoi Jane,' and to this day aren't all that pleased with that particular performance.

That was then, this is now.

Maybe the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences has more collective wisdom than a sixties starlet did.

AMPAS in Iran: No Political Agenda

According to AMPAS, anyway. They're being rather careful to point that out.

As International News put it, the Academy of Motion Picture Arts (AMPAS) visit to Iran is a " 'completely private initiative for educational and creative exchange and with no political agenda,' AMPAS director of communications Leslie Unger told AFP. She confirmed Iranian media reports saying the delegation included AMPAS president Sid Ganis, former president Frank Pierson, actress Annette Bening and producer William Horberg."

That "no political agenda" part sounds promising. And, AMPAS seems to be an movie industry/creative outfit: Maybe they really are just interested in comparing notes with Iranian movie-makers.

Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences: Political Activists, or Show Biz Types?

I discovered that the four AMPAS people mentioned in the article have somewhat controversial backgrounds: But, probably not politically controversial. Going off-topic for a moment: I'm dubious about the wisdom of trying to force Jeannie out of the bottle; I'm not surprised that the great B.S. was difficult to work with; I enjoyed "Mars Attacks;" and have never seen Poodle Springs, but shudder at that title being used for a Marlow movie.

I could be wrong, but it looks like the AMPAS delegation to Iran is a bunch of long-time American movie industry professionals, who want to see what movies and movie makers are like in Iran. If they remember that Iran isn't India, and that Bollywood probably won't happen in Iran until the Ayatollahs are out, I think they'll be okay.

I'm keeping a good thought about this visit.

AMPAS in Iran: What Good Could Possibly Come of This?

Provided that the AMPAS people remember who allows them enormous leeway in what sort of movies they can make, and who probably wouldn't, the American movie-makers could learn from what their counterparts in Iran have been doing lately, and the Iranian artists and producers could do the same. I see it as a potentially win-win situation, in terms of boosting creative output on both sides.

There's a possibility that Iranian movie people will understand a little more about their American counterparts - and vice versa - which can't, I think, hurt. Knowing the people behind movies, or any other information, can make communication easier.

And, as the years, decades, centuries, and millennia go on, people living in Iran and in North America will, I think be better off if they can communicate effectively.

Cultural Exchange?! Isn't Iran the Enemy?!

Yes, and no.
Death to the Jews! Death to the Great Satan America! - Friends of America, These Aren't
The Ayatollahs may or may not be willing to live in a world that knows about the Magna Carta, and those eighteenth century revolutions. President Ahmadinejad's version of reality may be wack, even by the Ayatollah's standards, and Iran efforts to develop a very peaceful nuclear program and advanced ICBMs seems to have even the EU concerned.

That's Iran's government. Which some Iranians don't seem to be entirely happy with.

Academy of Motion Picture Arts is, I hope, interested in meeting with Iranian movie-makers. Some of whom may be somewhat neutral about the Ayatollah's vision for Iran.

It's a bit difficult not to think of the "death to Israel! Death to the great Satan America!" outfit that runs Iran as a non-enemy of America.

But, they're just the people who are running Iran's government. Iran and the Iranian people were around for a long, long time before the Ayatollahs: and, for that matter, before the Shah. I think they'll be around long after the Shah, the Ayatollahs, and whatever comes next, pass from the scene and are as deep in the past as Darius1 is now.

So, politics and goofy ideology aside, I don't really see Iran and the Iranian people as 'the enemy.'

Related posts: In the news: Background:
1 I know: It's "Dārayavauš," not "Darius." But, as I've pointed out before: this blog is in English, so its readers generally understand that language. Not so many people understand Ancient Persian, though: so I'm using the form of Dārayavauš that English-speaking people got from the Graeco-Roman world.

2 comments:

Capt. Anon. said...

Anette Bening also deflowered a Jihadi in The Siege to get intel. FYI

Brian, aka Nanoc, aka Norski said...

Capt. Anon.,

Really? Is there a way to verify this?

Sorry: Sounds like scuttlebutt to me. Thanks, though.

Unique, innovative candles


Visit us online:
Spiral Light CandleFind a Retailer
Spiral Light Candle Store

Blogroll

Note! Although I believe that these websites and blogs are useful resources for understanding the War on Terror, I do not necessarily agree with their opinions. 1 1 Given a recent misunderstanding of the phrase "useful resources," a clarification: I do not limit my reading to resources which support my views, or even to those which appear to be accurate. Reading opinions contrary to what I believed has been very useful at times: sometimes verifying my previous assumptions, sometimes encouraging me to change them.

Even resources which, in my opinion, are simply inaccurate are sometimes useful: these can give valuable insights into why some people or groups believe what they do.

In short, It is my opinion that some of the resources in this blogroll are neither accurate, nor unbiased. I do, however, believe that they are useful in understanding the War on Terror, the many versions of Islam, terrorism, and related topics.