Monday, December 1, 2008

Cruise Ships and Safety: Designated Smoking Areas and Sonic Cannons

"Safety" means a lot of things. Oceania Cruise lines points out that
the "safety and security of all guests and staff" is important: That's why they have Designated Smoking Areas.

Their cruise ships also have sonic cannons, powerful engines, and at least one alert captain. The Nautica's sonic cannon wasn't used during yesterday's attack, but the crew had their Long Range Acoustic Device (LRAD), ready for use.

"Yesterday's attack?" I'm getting ahead of myself. The Nautica, a nice cruise ship, was minding its own business in the Gulf of Aden:
  • Good news:
    Somali pirates didn't hijack the Nautica
  • Bad news:
    Pirates tried
Over a thousand people, 386 crew and 690 passengers, are on the cruise ship. They're okay, and so is the ship.

One pirate skiff got within 300 yards and fired eight rifle shots, but the Natutica out-maneuvered it, and the other skiff involved in the attack. The cruise ship also outran the skiffs. I didn't realize that a cruise ship could make 23 knots. 27 miles an hour isn't all that impressive on land, but

Blame Time

One headline reads "Somali Pirates," which raises a question: What nut case of a captain would run a cruise ship near the Somali coast?

We still don't know the answer: because the Nautica was off the coast of Yemen when pirates attacked the cruise ship. That's according to someone speaking for the Nautica's owner, Oceania Cruises.

Actually, the Gulf of Aden isn't all that wide: a couple hundred miles, or about three hundred kilometers, depending on how you like to measure things. If Somali pirates have ship-based radar, and I'd think they could afford it, given their cash flow, they could target a cruise ship near the Yemeni coast and still have a good chance of staying out of the way of those international patrols.

View Larger Map

The Yemeni government's track record for keeping tight reins on illegal activity being what it is, I wouldn't be surprised to learn that a local sheik decided to boost his revenue through piracy, no matter what the leaders off in Sanaa thought about it.

I've noticed that "Somali pirates" has changed to "pirates" in news reports. That photo is from Sky News, when it was "Somali Pirates." I'm not clear on why news services thought the pirates were from Somalia.

It could simply be the result of starting with couple of facts, then making a dicey assumption:
  • The Nautica was attacked in the Gulf of Aden
  • Somalia is on the Gulf of Aden
  • Pirates operate in Somalia
  • These must be Somali pirates
I sure hope that the complexion of the pirates in that skiff isn't what made the editors write "Somali pirates." In that part of the world, not many people look like my Scandinavian forebears.

I'm also very glad that nobody got hurt.

Near-Miss for a Cruise Ship: Lessons to Learn?

I can think of a few:
  • Big engines are nice to have
  • Long Range Acoustic Devices (LRADs) are nice to have
  • Running is a good idea: particularly when you're in command of a cruise ship
  • This could have been turned out very badly
It's one thing to say 'no negotiations' when its a cargo ship with a relatively small crew: who presumably knew that they were going into one of the world's less-than-safe areas.

It's different, when over a thousand people, who may not have put two and two together and realized what "over-night stays in some of the world's most alluring ports" actually implies.

That shooting gallery, down at the south end of the Red Sea, isn't one of the areas that Oceania Cruises focuses on. But if you're going to get from Asia to Africa in a reasonable time, the Gulf of Aden is going to be on your route.

I still think that America's 'no negotiation' rule makes sense, gut-wrenching as it is. Paying ransom for the first boatload of cruise ship passengers and (I trust) the crew might result in a happy reunion for the people immediately involved. But it's hard to imagine that making the hijacking of a cruise ship profitable would discourage pirates from trying the same thing again. And again.

The alternative, of course, is extremely unpleasant in the short run: and I'm not sure that I'd have the nerve and determination it takes to refuse demands of pirates holding someone I know.

But emotional pain doesn't make rewarding pirates and putting the lives of the next ship in danger a good idea.

Long-Term Solution: Pirates Must Go

I sincerely hope that, a few decades from now, Somalia will be a nation with a functioning government, laws, and a lively sense of enlightened self-interest: not the colorful land of crazed religious zealots, lawless pirates, and besieged national 'leaders' it is now. That's going to take hard work, and brains.

Related post: In the news (most recent articles first, as usual): Background:

1 comment:

Bumstead said...

Just returned from a 12 day sailing in which I used my SmartSmokerUSA e-cigarette. The ship was smoke free with the exception of a small corner in the pool area. I was able to use the my SmartSmoker everywhere! The entire ship was amazed and the smokers were busy ordering their own SmartSmokerUSA e-cigarettes at every port stop (Internet Cafes). My husband and I were able to vape in our cabin, etc... What a difference it made for the trip! SmartSmokerUSA was so happy with the business that they have a special discount code for Cruise Ships. Use the discount code howard . I am not sure how long the code will be active. The Cruise Line's attitude is proof that the e-cigarette is gaining acceptance in spite of the attempts to stifle it!

P.S. I used my e-cigarette during the 8 hour flight home w/o incident. Nobody seemed to notice.

Unique, innovative candles

Visit us online:
Spiral Light CandleFind a Retailer
Spiral Light Candle Store


Note! Although I believe that these websites and blogs are useful resources for understanding the War on Terror, I do not necessarily agree with their opinions. 1 1 Given a recent misunderstanding of the phrase "useful resources," a clarification: I do not limit my reading to resources which support my views, or even to those which appear to be accurate. Reading opinions contrary to what I believed has been very useful at times: sometimes verifying my previous assumptions, sometimes encouraging me to change them.

Even resources which, in my opinion, are simply inaccurate are sometimes useful: these can give valuable insights into why some people or groups believe what they do.

In short, It is my opinion that some of the resources in this blogroll are neither accurate, nor unbiased. I do, however, believe that they are useful in understanding the War on Terror, the many versions of Islam, terrorism, and related topics.