Sure: the circumstances aren't the same. Staff of the embassy are being held, not the whole embassy; ayatollahs are running Iran, not a shah; and the embassy is British, not American.
Iran's government says that the nine or so British embassy staffers were arrested because the helped Britain mess up Iran's recent presidential election. I think the ayatollahs did a fine job of that on their own, with no outside help, but let that pass for now.
"...The Iranian government has long accused other countries, especially Britain, of "meddling" in its affairs, but has offered no proof any outside forces have been involved in the unrest since the election...." (CNN)Diplomacy between Iran and the U.K. has been a bit strained of late, since Britain won't do what the ayatollahs want it to. Last week, Iran's government expelled two British diplomats. In diplomatese, that's a way of showing displeasure. Britain, in turn, expelled two Iranian diplomats. Then, Tehran booted the British ambassador. That's upping the ante considerably.
The British government says they didn't interfere with Iran's election, and I'm inclined to believe them.
Meanwhile, Iran softened its ban on public demonstrations by allowing one today, in honor of Mohammad Beheshti. I'd say that it's a case of some demonstrations being more equal than others. Beheshti is a hero of the 1979 Islamic Revolution. (June 28, 2009)
So That's Why the Numbers are So Low!
Wonder why the body count for one day of demonstrations was 19 (June 20, 2009, officially, but people who weren't on the ayatollahs' payroll said it was around 150? This might give part of the answer:"...Amnesty International has collected accounts from people who have left Iran and expatriates with relatives there who say the Basij has prohibited medical professionals from getting identification information from wounded demonstrators who check in, Akhlaghi said on Saturday. They are also not allowed to ask how the injuries happened, and relatives are hard pressed to find the wounded.The official line in the ayatollah's government seems to be that the CIA, or terrorists, or anybody but their own enforcers shot Neda, that not many people at all were killed, and that Iranians had better stop complaining, or they'll disappear, too.
"Once the patients are treated, the militia removes them from the hospital to an undisclosed location, she said...." (CNN)
It just might work.
As for seizing embassy staffers: something like that tied America in knots until President Regan took office. At that point, the current rulers of Iran seemed almost in a rush to get rid of their hostages.
Maybe the ayatollahs figure that, if it worked once, it's worth trying again. At this point, with the mess they've got on their hands, I suppose they may be willing to try anything.
Related posts:
- "Pray for Neda: And Learn About the Real Iran"
(June 26, 2009)- My take on an op ed piece that I highly recommend
- "Moussavi Told to Keep Quiet Like a Loser Should"
(June 26, 2009) - "CIA Shot Neda: Old Story, New Names"
(June 26, 2009) - "Iran: 'Terrorists' Killed Neda Agha Soltan - Officially"
(June 24, 2009) - "Journalism in the Information Age, Or Nothing Says 'No' Like a Brightly Burning Motorcycle"
(June 24, 2009)
- "Britain blasts arrest of embassy staffers in Iran"
CNN (June 28, 2009) - "Report: Hospitalized Iranians seized"
CNN (June 28, 2009) - "Britain blasts arrest of embassy staffers in Iran"
CNN (June 28, 2009)
No comments:
Post a Comment