Think 'there oughtta be a law' against saying bad things about America? Or Australia, or India, or whichever country you call "home?"
Some countries work that way:
"Bahrain tries ex-lawmakers, imprisons poet"I think it's reasonable, in America, that calling for the overthrow of our government to be illegal.
CNN (June 12, 2011)
"...Meanwhile, poet Ayat al-Qormozi, 20, was found guilty of assembling at Pearl Roundabout, the epicenter of anti-government demonstrations in the kingdom earlier this year. Additional charges included speaking out against Bahrain and the king.
"The Bahrain Youth Society for Human Rights said she read a poem criticizing government policy at the Roundabout.
"Mubarak, the government official, said Bahrain had freedom of speech, but that there were limits.
" 'Freedom of speech in this country has its boundaries and cannot touch on the leadership, and cannot call for the overthrow of the government,' he said.
"Her poem, he said, 'caused incitement and hatred to his majesty the king and to the prime minister' with lines such as 'we are people who kill humiliation' and 'assassinate misery.'..."
That's what we have elections for - to swap out the current nitwits for new ones, who at least may do less damage.
Laws against criticizing the government? That makes revolution sound more reasonable. As I recall, that's part of why colonists got fed up with George III's administration, back when.
And that isn't, quite, another topic.
Related posts:
- "Libya, Syria, Bahrain: Journalists Uncooperative; 'the Masses' Worse"
(March 29, 2011) - "Bahrain, Foreign Troops, and - Maybe - the Last Stand of Kings"
(March 18, 2011) - "Bahrain, Libya: My Take on the News"
(February 19, 2011) - "Bahrain, Libya: My Take on the News"
(February 19, 2011) - "Bahrain and the Information Age"
(February 19, 2011)
No comments:
Post a Comment