"Muslims Jailed, Suspect Arrested: Terrorism and Australia's Bushfires Burn On"
(February 14, 2009))
(Update:
"Islamic Website Called for 'Forest Jihad' - But Still No Evidence in Victoria"
(February 9, 2009))
I don't track individuals who visit my blogs, but I do keep track of data like referring pages and search strings.
One visitor to a post in another blog had Googled "muslim bushfire victoria" - without the quotation marks. The post ("Australia's Victoria State Bushfires: 65+ Dead" (Apathetic Lemming of the North (February 8, 2009)) doesn't contain the word "Muslim," but does discuss the disastrous fires in Victoria.
Intentionally set wildfires or bushfires would, I think, make an effective terror weapon. I discussed this possibility last year, when the Sierra Madre fire was burning. It was (barely) possible that last spring's big fire in California was an act of terror.
But - as I wrote then - "I seriously doubt it."
I'll say the same for Australia's lethal fires in Victoria. At least some were intentionally set: "Kieran Walshe, the deputy police commissioner for the state, said: 'When you look at the way fires started, you can clearly see it's not possible for a natural ignition to occur.' " (CNN)
But, that does not mean that Islamic terrorists were involved - or any other sort of terrorist, in the usual sense of the word. Arson - particularly on this scale - is criminal. But not necessarily an act of terrorism.
Related post:
- "Sierra Madre Fire: It Could Be Worse"
(April 28, 2008)
- "Scores killed in Australia's 'worst fires' "
CNN (February 8, 2009)
3 comments:
Thanks for posting on this. The main fires, those that caused the most deaths and destruction were just 20 miles North of our home ... One of my work collegues lost his life trying to flee the flames on Saturday afternoon ...
AI,
My pleasure.
And, please allow me to extend my condolences.
daniel,
I haven't a clue what "study" you're referring to. Or how forms and browsing are involved.
On the chance that you're a human being and not an advertisement bot, I'm leaving your comment intact.
Maybe someone else can make sense of it.
Everybody else: I have no idea what that link on "daniel"'s comment leads to.
Post a Comment